Reliability of nociceptive monitors vs. standard practice during general anesthesia: a prospective observational study
- Published on 02/03/2025
- Reading time: 4 min.
Norbeck Daniel Widarsson 1,2, Lindgren Sophie 5, Wolf Axel 1,3,4, Jildenstål Pether 1,2,6,7
1 https://ror.org/01tm6cn81 Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden
2 https://ror.org/04vgqjj36 Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Sahlgrenska University Hospital Gothenburg Sweden
3 https://ror.org/04vgqjj36 Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra Gothenburg Sweden
4 https://ror.org/04q12yn84 Institute of Nursing and Health Promotion Oslo Metropolitan University Oslo Norway
5 https://ror.org/04vgqjj36 Department of Hybride and Interventional Procedures Sahlgrenska University Hospital Gothenburg Sweden
6 https://ror.org/012a77v79 Department of Health Sciences Lund University Lund Sweden
7 https://ror.org/05kytsw45 Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Örebro University Hospital and School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University Örebro Sweden
Abstract
Background Inadequate or excessive nociceptive control during general anesthesia can result in significant adverse outcomes. Using traditional clinical variables, such as heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and respiratory rate, to assess and manage nociceptive responses is often insufficient and could lead to overtreatment with both anesthetics and opioids. This study evaluated the feasibility and effectiveness of three nociception monitoring techniques Nociception...
To continue reading this article in Full-Text...
Peer-Reviewed Journals A-Z
Search | Advanced search
Get the latest news in Critical Care Medicine
Receive our newsletter to stay up to date with the latest news in Critical Care Medicine