Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass versus single internal thoracic artery grafting procedures for multivessel coronary artery disease: a single-center retrospective analysis
- Published on 04/14/2025
- Reading time: 5 min.
Kakoush Mohammad 1, Gordon Amit 1, Farkash Ariel 1, Teich Nadav 1, Sela Orr 1, Pevni Dmitri 1, Ziv-Baran Tomer 2, Kfir Jonathan 1, Ben-Gal Yanai 1
1 https://ror.org/04nd58p63 Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv Israel
2 https://ror.org/04mhzgx49 Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv Israel
Abstract
Objective To compare two surgical strategies for myocardial revascularization: one by a minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) and the other by a conventional full sternotomy coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
Methods We reviewed the early outcomes and overall survival of all the patients treated in our center by the above strategies during 2000–2011.
Results Of 1915 patients, 1752 underwent conventional CABG utilizing...
To continue reading this article in Full-Text...
Peer-Reviewed Journals A-Z
Search | Advanced search
Get the latest news in Cardiology
Receive our newsletter to stay up to date with the latest news in Cardiology
