Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive cardiac imaging modalities in patients with a history of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis
- Published on 09/02/2024
- Reading time: 6 min.
Ruurt A Jukema1, Jorge Dahdal1,2, Eline M Kooijman1, Ellaha Wahedi1, Ruben W de Winter1, Marco Guglielmo3, Maarten Jan Cramer3, Pim van der Harst3, Sharon Remmelzwaal4, Pieter Raijmakers5, Paul Knaapen1, Ibrahim Danad1,3
1Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
2Department of Medicine, Hospital del Salvador, Santiago, Chile
3Division of Heart and Lungs, Department of Cardiology, Utrecht University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
4Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
5Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & PET Research, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Correspondence to Dr Ibrahim Danad, Department of Cardiology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1081, The Netherlands; i.danad@amsterdamumc.nl
Abstract
Background The diagnostic performance of non-invasive imaging techniques for detecting obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with a history of myocardial infarction or percutaneous coronary intervention has not been comprehensively evaluated. This meta-analysis assesses the diagnostic value of coronary CT angiography (CCTA), CCTA combined with CT perfusion (CCTA+CTP), cardiac MRI (CMR) and single-photon emission CT (SPECT) compared with invasive reference...
To continue reading this article in Full-Text...
Peer-Reviewed Journals A-Z
Search | Advanced search
Get the latest news in Cardiology
Receive our newsletter to stay up to date with the latest news in Cardiology
